Press Backgrounder

 

Natural History Data Predict Course of Untreated Multiple Sclerosis

 

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system for which the exact cause is unknown. It is suspected that MS is a disorder of the immune system whose development is facilitated by certain genetic and environmental factors. In other words, development of the disease is facilitated in people who inherit a genetic susceptibility to MS, who live on the latitude band where MS is most prevalent and who, at a vulnerable age (early teens), come into contact with a virus or whatever antigen may trigger off the immune reaction leading ultimately to the progressive demyelination and neurological damage we call MS. The natural course of the disease is also variable and often unpredictable to start with.

 

Relapsing remitting affects 85% of new cases

At onset, approximately 85 per cent of new cases follow the relapsing remitting (RR) pattern of disease.1 This consists of acute inflammatory attacks with symptoms of inflammation and impairment according to which nerves have been targeted by the disease process on that occasion. Any white matter can be affected but optic and sensory nerves are often singled out at first. The first symptoms are therefore often optic neuritis or a tingling sensation in the legs. Symptoms usually develop over days, remain constant for a few weeks, then resolve gradually over a couple of months.

 

More than 80% of RRMS patients move on to secondary progressive MS2

With time, remissions are less complete and some disability persists. More than 80% of the relapsing remitting group eventually move along the continuum of disease to the secondary progressive form with a gradual accrual of irreversible disability regardless of whether relapses continue or not.2

 

Studies show natural history of untreated MS

Until 1993 there was no disease-modifying treatment available for multiple sclerosis. This has enabled researchers interested in the natural history of untreated MS to amass data on large numbers of patients followed for almost 30 years. In future comparisons can be made between the time taken for disease to progress in patients treated with interferon beta from the onset of symptoms with the experience of patients who had no access to disease-modifying therapy.

 

Natural history data allow certain broad generalisations to be made about untreated MS:

 

25 year Canadian study confirms natural history of MS

Professor George Ebers of the London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada, recently presented data on 1,099 MS patients, followed for 25 years, at the 1998 meeting of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).4 Information was still available on almost 90 per cent of the study population. Over the years, 3 per cent of participants were found not to have MS and 10 per cent were lost to follow-up.

Of the remainder 286 (30.8%) had died with 179 of those deaths (62.8%) attributed to MS. Of the others, 10% died of cancer, 3% of respiratory disease and the rest of heart disease.

The number of relapses experienced by patients during the first year after diagnosis was measured against time to reach specific points on the Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

 

Time to reach an EDSS score of 3 (mild-to-moderate disability), was:

Time to reach EDSS 8 (bed bound for most of the day) was:

 

Median time to reaching the secondary progressive stage of the disease from onset for the whole study population was:

 

French data concurs with Canadian study

Data on more than 2,500 MS patients has been collected since 1976 by Professor Christian Confavreux of Hopital de l'Antiquaille, Lyon, France, and was also presented at the 1998 ECTRIMS meeting.5 Across the board, this study shows the following:

 

How treatment could alter the course of MS

The pivotal studies of Betaferon in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive MS give an idea of how the natural history of MS may be altered with treatment.5, 6

A patient with RRMS who might normally experience three relapses in the first year could expect to suffer only two as a result of Betaferon treatment. According to the Canadian data this would mean a patient could anticipate three extra years before reaching an EDSS score of 3 (mild disability) and 11 extra years before reaching EDSS 8, the bed-bound stage.

The earlier a patient begins therapy with interferon beta-1b, the greater the chance of suppressing disease etkinligini and preserving the integrity of nerve axons and their myelin sheaths. By maintaining the structure of the nervous system as long as possible, impairment of neurological function should be minimised.

 

REFERENCES

1. Goodkin DE. Interferon beta therapy for multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1486–7.

2. Weinshenker BG et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability.Brain 1989; 112: 133–146

3. Andersen O and Runmarker B. Natural history of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 1998: 5 (suppl.2): S13–14.

4. Ebers GC. Oral Presentation, ECTRIMS, Stockholm 1998.

5. Confavreux, C. Oral Presentation, ECTRIMS, Stockholm 1998.

5. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting MS.I and II. Neurol 1993; 43: 655–667.

6. European Study Group on Interferon beta-1b in Secondary Progressive MS. Placebo-controlled multicentre randomised trial of interferon beta-1b in treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1491–7